Grantwork · For grant-funded organisations

Carry evidence from application to monitoring return.

The facts a funder asks for at application time are the same ones they ask for at monitoring time — but most teams reconstruct them twice, in different Word documents, months apart. Grantwork keeps funders, conditions and evidence in one record so nothing is written from scratch twice.

Discuss a pilot See the core platform

The workflow

One record, end to end

Funder / application
Stages & conditions
Impact measures & outcomes
Application or monitoring draft

What changes

Three things that stop being painful

Outcome 1

Applications answered from confirmed facts

Charity numbers, policies, safeguarding statements and track record come from your reviewed claims register — consistent in every application.

In the product: Funder-form transcription and drafting that pulls from claims and the vault, with citations to check.

Outcome 2

Award conditions stop being surprises

Conditions and reporting deadlines are recorded against each award the day it lands, not rediscovered in a panic before a return is due.

In the product: Per-grant stages and conditions visible across the whole portfolio.

Outcome 3

Monitoring returns from live impact evidence

Outcomes and impact measures accumulate against the grant through the year, so the return is assembled from records rather than memory.

In the product: Impact measures per grant, drawn into monitoring drafts you review before anything leaves the building.

In the workspace

What lives here

A register of funders, applications and live awards
Stages, conditions and deadlines per grant
Impact measures and outcome evidence collected against each award
The document vault: previous bids, policies, accounts and reports, all citable
Confirmed organisational facts reused across every application

Deliverables

What comes out

Application draftMonitoring return draftFunder-form answers (paste-ready)Editable PowerPointPDF report

Drafting is transcribe, verify, draft, paste: Flowgrid drafts from cited evidence, you verify and paste into the funder's own portal. Flowgrid never submits to a funder, and your data is isolated from every other customer's at the database level.

Is this for you?

A good fit — and an honest miss

Likely a good fit

You hold or apply for several grants a year with written reporting attached.
Different funders keep asking for the same organisational facts.
You want drafts grounded in your own documents, not generic AI text.

Probably not yet

You want automatic submission to funder portals — Flowgrid deliberately stops at a verified draft.
You need a funder-discovery database; Grantwork manages the grants you pursue, it doesn't find them.
A single annual grant with a one-page return may not repay the setup.

Next step

Bring your next application or return. We'll pilot it end to end.

Discuss a pilot Ask a question first